Using Intellectual Property to Increase Shareholder Value

 For today’s companies, intellectual property represents almost three fourths of the company’s assets. General Counsels, in addition to performing traditional legal duties, are now responsible for finding ways to increase shareholder value. As a first step to increasing shareholder value, many General Counsels find it helpful to assess where their companies fall on the Intellectual Property Value Hierarchy.  This approach may also be useful for company directors and owners.

 The Intellectual Property Value Hierarchy is a pyramid of five levels and each level represents an increased demand on the persons responsible for the company’s intellectual property. Additionally, each of the higher levels relies on the lower levels for support. The five levels of the Intellectual Property Value Hierarchy are as follows:

1. The Defensive Level:

Level one companies primarily seek to provide a patent shield to protect the company from litigation and are reactive in nature.  Level one companies aspire to patent as many products as possible, pay maintenance fees on those patents, and negotiate cross licenses with competitors.  

 2. Cost Control Level:

 Level two companies focus on cutting the costs of filing and maintaining patent portfolios. On a case-by-case basis, level two companies evaluate which patents should be protected and maintained.  Level two companies also pick and choose the countries in which patent protection should be sought. Because level two companies focus on cost cutting, licensing is not a high priority.

 3. Profit Center Level:

 Although level three companies continue efforts to cut costs, these companies begin to focus on proactive strategies to generate revenue through selling or licensing of intellectual property. Level three companies also generate revenue through litigation against patent infringers. At level three, individual business units have relinquished control over their intellectual property assets to a consolidated function. Level three companies, in addition to taking an inventory of current patents, evaluate the current corporate direction and decide whether the patent strategy needs to be reexamined.  

4. Integration level:

In level four companies, the intellectual property function begins to reach outside of the department and attempts to help other parts of the organization reach their goals. Level four companies look beyond the present intellectual property portfolio to determine what gaps exist in patent protection or technology development.  These companies also monitor the competitor’s technologies as disclosed in their international patent filings. Additionally, level four companies find ways to use intellectual property as collateral, to create tax benefits, and to assist in mergers, acquisitions, or divestiture of company assets.

5.  Visionary Level:

Level five companies begin to identify future consumer and industrial trends. Additionally, level five companies anticipate technological revolutions and actively seek to protect the company’s margins and market share in the future. Level five companies create trends by identifying sources of customer dissatisfaction and bridging that gap.  Additionally, level five companies take the lead in developing methods to measure and report the value of their intellectual property.  

 It is not the end of the world to realize that your company is not operating to maximize its shareholder value through intellectual property.  However, this realization is a clear sign that there is room for improvement. With the proper discipline, organization, and leadership, every company can successfully strive to increase its shareholder value through intellectual property.  

* This summary is a condensation prepared with permission from a presentation provided by Ms. Julie L. Davis, Arthur Anderson L.L.P. at the American Intellectual Property Law Association 2000 Annual Meeting.

© 1995 - 2004
PRAVEL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.
All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Caution: The information presented on this website is general in nature and should not be considered as legal advice for any specific issue. You should contact an appropriate intellectual property attorney for your specific concerns.