Porsche Court Order-Domain Name Litigation

Trust your intellectual property matters to a firm that has solid experience in intellectual property litigation. Remember, the true value of your patent, trademark or copyright may not be fully known until after it has been tested through litigation.

The following cases were litigated directly or with the local counsel support of Pravel Intellectual Property Law, P.C.:

Patent Litigation:

Derrick Mfg. Corp. V. Southwestern Wire Cloth, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5809 (unpublished)

Domain Name Litigation:

PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and DR. ING. H.c.F. PORSCHE AG. vs. PORSCH.COM, an Internet domain name, et al. (Civ. No. 99-0006-A, Eastern District - VA)

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., a corporation vs. LUCENTSUCKS.COM, a domain name,

PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and DR. ING. H.c.F. PORSCHE AG. vs. PORSCH.COM, an Internet domain name, et al. (Civ. No. 99-0006-A, Eastern District - VA).

Caesars World, Inc. v. Caesars-Palace.com et al., (Civ. No. 99-550-A, Eastern District - VA).

C.B. Fleet Company, Incorporated v. Spider Webs, Ltd. (Civ. No. 00-446-A, Eastern District – VA).

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., a corporation vs. LUCENTSUCKS.COM, a domain name, (Civ. No. 99-1916-A, Eastern District – VA)

Trademark Opposition:

Ra-Ware Technologies, Inc. v. Raw Communications Limited, TTAB Number 122,922

Freegear, Inc. v. Trisha Teems Murphy; Trisha's, Inc. and Mittu's, Inc. (99-11272 (RZx) Central District - CA).

Caution: The information presented on this website is general in nature and should not be considered as legal advice for any specific issue. You should contact an appropriate intellectual property attorney for your specific concerns.